Who would win in a fight between James Bowie and Davy Crockett?
You can check the answer of the people under the question at Quora “davy crockett bowie knife“
Who would win in a fight between James Bowie and Davy Crockett?
You can check the answer of the people under the question at Quora “davy crockett bowie knife“
Crockett was a good fighter and hunter. As a politician and entertainer he sometimes exaggerated his skills for fun and profit.
Bowie for much of his life was a good fighter and hunter, who fought a number of duels and appears in some reliable accounts to have been prepared to enter a lethal dispute on short notice merely because of prodrug of personal honor.
There are things I like about both men and things to be careful about. Crockett got shut out of politics because of sense of right and wrong and being unwilling to go against his perception of it. They are probably closely matched at most times of their lives, I think Bowie might have the edge on being willing to go lethal quicker, a being more persistent.
On the Sandbar fight, a formal duel expanded into a brawl. Bowie was shot in the hip early in the transition to brawl. He ran at his shooter, and was struck by him with enough force to break the pistol. Then stabbed in the chest with the sword cane of the shooter. The blade got stuck in Bowie’s sternum. Then Bowie killed the man with his knife. Bowie got shot a couple more times. Bowie took either 2 bullets, seven stab wounds, other injuries, OR 3 bullets, four stab wounds, and some other injuries. While he took months to heal, Bowie acquired a national reputation as difficult to take down.
I think I give the fight to Bowie.
Chicago Cutlery Belden 15 Piece Premium Kitchen Knife
I would guess Crockett, Bowie was good with knives for in close fighting. He was sick while at the Alamo and in the infirmary, he did not make the north wall to fight. Both were very brave because they knew how the fight was going to end.
Authentic XYJ Since 1986,Outstanding Ancient Forging,6.7 Inch Full Tang
Oh, Stop! Don’t you think that it’s pretty obvious? What kind of fight, ‘Professor?’ Out in the woods or in some smokey back room? Bowie was a bar room brawler and never walked away from knife fight. Crockett was a frontiersman with an insatiable curiosity about what lay over the next horizon. Crockett was too smart to get mixed up in some penny ante saloon argument. Surely you can come up with a more thought provoking question that reflects some thought on your part.
Wanbasion Black Stainless Steel Knife Set, Sharp Kitchen Knife
A matchup between James Bowie and Davy Crockett would be decided primarily by the choice of venue.
If the battleground of these two accomplished warriors were a forest, Crockett would have the advantage. He is well-established as a top flight marksman, tracker, and woodsman. At the Alamo, he was one of the leading rifles whose accuracy made Santa Ana’s army hold its distance.
Davy Crockett was as fine a hunter, tracker, and rifleman as you could hope to find in the era of black powder firearms. In any duel in the woods, he would go to ground and attempt to spot his opponent first. He would likely succeed, and that would be the end of it. (And of his opponent.)
However, if the match were held on open ground, the smart money would be on Bowie. Unlike Crockett, who in military service was something of a free agent, Bowie was a team player and leader. That discipline would serve him well in hand-to-hand combat.
And Bowie was a proven knife fighter, having acquitted himself well in a deadly melee in 1827, outside of Natchez, Mississippi. Bowie was wounded several times in the fight but planted what is thought to have been a butcher knife in one foe, killing him instantly. The story spread quickly, likely growing in the telling, and his legend was born.
Newspapers picked up the story, which became known as the Sandbar Fight, and described in detail Bowie’s fighting prowess and his unusual knife. Witness accounts agreed that Bowie did not attack first, and the others had focused their attack on Bowie because “they considered him the most dangerous man among their opposition.” The incident cemented Bowie’s reputation across the South as a superb knife fighter.
You don’t bring a knife to a gunfight – unless you’re James Bowie, then you bring your trademark “Bowie knife” and kick arse. Bowie is thought to have been killed at the Alamo while fighting from his bed, probably recovering from a wound.
We don’t really have much factual basis for an accurate evaluation of Crockett and Bowie as fighters. The truth is obscured by worshipful legends regarding their accomplishments. We do know enough, however, to know that while both were soldiers at various times, Crockett excelled at woodsmanship and was a crack shot with a rifle, whereas Bowie’s legend hung largely on his larger-than-life skills as a knife fighter.
From a sufficient distance, such as a Hunger Games type scenario in a forest, Crockett’s ability in the woods and his marksmanship would give him an advantage over Bowie. At close quarters, however, too close for a rifle and no time to reload, it seems likely that Bowie would have the advantage.
If I were forced to pick a winner between these two storied men, I would have to set my gold half-eagles down on:
Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier
As it happens, Bowie took massive injuries in his signature brawl in Mississippi. He was shot in the hip, hit over the head with a pistol, impaled with a sword, then shot again and stabbed. The doctors removed the bullets and patched him up, but while the fight proves one thing – that Bowie can take a hell of a lot of punishment – it also proves another thing, and another reason why Crockett would take him down:
Bowie can’t dodge for shit.
(He’d definitely lose if they were dueling with dodgeballs, yo.)
Epilogue:The Bowie Knife
While Bowie would totally fall to Crockett in a fair fight because I said so, he did leave one lasting legacy to his country: the Bowie knife, aka Arkansas toothpick, a big honking knife as quintessentially American as it gets. Or in Merriam-Webster’s somewhat more erudite description , a Bowie knife is
a stout single-edged hunting knife with part of the back edge curved concavely to a point and sharpened.
This knife is even more impressive than Crockett’s practical legacy – the coonskin cap.
See? Just like I said – the Bowie knife is one big honkin’ knife. This fine example was hand-forged by Dutch knife, sword, and dagger maker Freerk Wieringa, a self-described artist in steel. I’m not going to argue with him, especially while he’s holding that thing.
According to Wikipedia ,
After the Sandbar Fight and subsequent battles in which Bowie used his knife to defend himself, the Bowie knife became very popular. Many craftsmen and manufacturers made their own versions, and major cities of the Old Southwest had “Bowie knife schools” that taught “the art of cut, thrust, and parry.” His fame, and that of his knife, spread to Britain and, by the early 1830s, many British manufacturers were producing Bowie knives for shipment to the United States. The design of the knife continued to evolve but a Bowie knife is now generally considered to have a blade 8.25 inches (21.0 cm) long and 1.25 inches (3.2 cm) wide, with a curved point, a “sharp false edge cut from both sides”, and a cross-guard to protect the user’s hands.
There is considerable debate on who actually designed and crafted the first knife of this kind, but the one thing that’s not in dispute is that it’s a beauty.
Amazon Basics 14-Piece Kitchen Knife Block Set, High-Carbon
While Bowie was an amazing singer with such hits as Golden Years, Starman and Space Oddity, he was also quite skinny and frankly not very muscular.
Crockett on the other hand , though inconvenienced with a odd first name of Betty was an experienced woodsman. Unfortunately he was often hampered in battle by is love for baking cakes and other pastries. Often he could be found in the mess hall baking a Red Velvet cake for his men rather than fighting beside them. I would still go with Crockett though.
imarku Japanese Chef Knife – Pro Kitchen Knife 8 Inch Chef’s Knives
I would put my money on Bowie in a knife fight, but in a knife fight the saying goes “the winner ends up in the hospital” so there is alot of luck is involved.
In a gunfight, whoever shot straighter first would win. They both had similar frontiersman experience with various weapons. Bowie had military experiences in the months and years before the Alamo. On the Crockett side,he did see military service but there was nothing notable about his militia service. “There were limited stores of powder and shot inside the Alamo, and Alamo commander William Barret Travis ordered the artillery to stop returning fire on February 26 so as to conserve precious ammunition. Crockett and his men were encouraged to keep shooting, as they were unusually effective. “ [137] , and
In an unarmed fight, I would think that Bowie’s knife fighting experience(it should carry over into an unarmed fight somewhat) and notable toughness would shift things slightly in his favor.
Smith & Wesson Extreme Ops SWA24S 7.1in S.S. Folding Knife with 3.1in
Davy Crockett without a doubt. Jim Bowie would bring a knife to a gun fight.
Spring Assisted Knife – Pocket Folding Knife – Military Style
If they had to stalk each other with muskets over rough terrain I’d say Crockett has the advantage, but in a dual or a dirty bar brawl Bowie would have the advantage, He was a brawler, a rough and tumble fighter a dualist and deadly with a knife.
12-Piece Color-Coded Kitchen Knife Set, 6 Knives with 6 Blade Guards